add sentence about request to Enrichment requiring recipe #526
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nuclearkatie
changed the title
gonuke
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @nuclearkatie
(But now I want to know why we never figured out how to reuse the documentation
nuclearkatie
added a commit
to nuclearkatie/cycamore
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
More than once now, I've forgotten to include a recipe in my request for the product commodity from cycamore enrichmentt, and then been confused why my enrichment facility is not trading material. This adds a sentence to the docs with a gentle reminder that a request for the product commod is not enough; the request must also have an associated recipe