Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating naming for Conjur editions #1412

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2021
Merged

Conversation

john-odonnell
Copy link
Contributor

Updating naming for Conjur editions

  • converts Conjur OSS to Conjur Open Source
  • converts DAP/Dynamic Access Provider to Conjur Enterprise
  • maintains Conjur OSS Suite and Conjur Open Source Suite

This is part of an automated batch of PRs across many repos listed in cyberark/community#92

@john-odonnell john-odonnell marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2021 01:03
@john-odonnell john-odonnell requested a review from a team as a code owner June 22, 2021 01:03
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@john-odonnell john-odonnell force-pushed the johnodon-conjur-name-change branch from 3ee1f12 to 735292e Compare July 7, 2021 16:43
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@john-odonnell john-odonnell force-pushed the johnodon-conjur-name-change branch from 735292e to 218c27e Compare July 7, 2021 17:33
@codeclimate
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Jul 7, 2021

Code Climate has analyzed commit 218c27e and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 53.6% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

@john-odonnell john-odonnell merged commit 08dca7f into main Jul 7, 2021
@john-odonnell john-odonnell deleted the johnodon-conjur-name-change branch July 7, 2021 19:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants