[Dependent] Simple Review Pipeline (Client)

[bsekachev]

Motivation and context

Depends on #2338
Resolved #2082
Related #1100

How has this been tested?

Checklist

• I submit my changes into the develop branch
• I have added description of my changes into CHANGELOG file
• I have updated the documentation accordingly
• I have added tests to cover my changes
• I have linked related issues (read github docs)
• I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary (cvat-canvas,
  cvat-core, cvat-data and cvat-ui)

License

• I submit my code changes under the same MIT License that covers the project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
• I have updated the license header for each file (see an example below)

# Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation
#
# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

[nmanovic]

I got the error below. Try to assign an issue on an object and after that remove the object. Go to next frame with an object.

TypeError
Cannot read property 'label' of undefined

TypeError: Cannot read property 'label' of undefined
    at Function.mapToProps (http://localhost:8080/cvat-ui.4ab42c810efc6fc7738e.min.js:365:1027292)
    at a (http://localhost:8080/cvat-ui.4ab42c810efc6fc7738e.min.js:365:465545)
    at Function.a.mapToProps (http://localhost:8080/cvat-ui.4ab42c810efc6fc7738e.min.js:365:465682)
    at a (http://localhost:8080/cvat-ui.4ab42c810efc6fc7738e.min.js:365:465545)
    at http://localhost:8080/cvat-ui.4ab42c810efc6fc7738e.min.js:365:466910
    at http://localhost:8080/cvat-ui.4ab42c810efc6fc7738e.min.js:365:464319
    at Object.useMemo (http://localhost:8080/cvat-ui.4ab42c810efc6fc7738e.min.js:341:62782)
    at t.useMemo (http://localhost:8080/cvat-ui.4ab42c810efc6fc7738e.min.js:325:5984)
    at d (http://localhost:8080/cvat-ui.4ab42c810efc6fc7738e.min.js:365:464263)
    at qo (http://localhost:8080/cvat-ui.4ab42c810efc6fc7738e.min.js:341:57930)

[bsekachev]

@nmanovic

I found another way to reproduce a bit, but anyway should be fixed now.

[bsekachev]

@nmanovic @ActiveChooN
So, the patch looks quite stable. At least I do not see any critical issues any more

[nmanovic]

@bsekachev , I will review right now and merge if I don't see any issues.