Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Undo functionality #6

Closed
headdab opened this issue Jul 12, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Undo functionality #6

headdab opened this issue Jul 12, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@bsekachev
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone
Release 0.2.0

Comments

@headdab
Copy link

headdab commented Jul 12, 2018

Have you considered undo functionality?
Seems like that would be a very useful feature.
Thanks.
@nmanovic
Copy link
Contributor

@headdab,

We agree. It is a very useful feature. I'm not sure that it will be delivered in our next release but we will try to implement it in the future. Do you have any idea how it should be implemented to be convenient for you? For example, it can be per frame/image only or global with jumps to corresponding frames.

@nmanovic nmanovic added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 12, 2018
@headdab
Copy link
Author

headdab commented Jul 13, 2018

I haven't used the tool enough to have a strong opinion, but the case I'm most concerned about is when I delete something, like a track, accidentally and want to recover it.

Intuitively, I think it should just undo exactly what the last keystroke or mouse click did.
However, I think it only needs to undo database visible changes, i.e., we don't need to undo frame seeking, that type of thing.

@headdab headdab changed the title Feature request: undo functionality Undo functionality Jul 13, 2018
@nmanovic nmanovic added this to the Release 0.2.0 milestone Aug 13, 2018
@nmanovic
Copy link
Contributor

Done in develop branch. Documentation will be updated lately.

bsekachev pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2018
Some AAM refactoring #6
2192e18
bsekachev pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2018
Some AAM refactoring #6
5c8ebde
bsekachev pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2018
Some AAM refactoring #6
0bb168b
@olgatias olgatias mentioned this issue Jul 31, 2019
Closed
azhavoro pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 25, 2019
@ygnn123
Merge pull request #6 from azhavoro/az/fix_unittests
41ca049 
fixed unit tests
@l3xis l3xis mentioned this issue Mar 1, 2020
Closed
@nmanovic nmanovic mentioned this issue Jul 19, 2021
Merged
3 tasks
TOsmanov referenced this issue in TOsmanov/cvat Aug 23, 2021
Fixes (#6)
f72848b
korshunovdv pushed a commit to Evocargo/cvat that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2021
# This is a combination of 2 commits.
1aa7b70 
# This is the 1st commit message:

# This is a combination of 3 commits.
# This is the 1st commit message:

# This is a combination of 8 commits.
# This is the 1st commit message:

setup config

Add built from source code

one domain name insted of two

add installation guide

update gitignore

# This is the commit message cvat-ai#2:

delete serverless (nuclio)

# This is the commit message cvat-ai#3:

add backup script to gitignore

# This is the commit message cvat-ai#4:

Add script for backup data

# This is the commit message cvat-ai#5:

Add docstrings for backup script

# This is the commit message cvat-ai#6:

Update backup script to delete after 30 days

# This is the commit message cvat-ai#7:

Fix backup error

# This is the commit message cvat-ai#8:

Update backup rules, and decrease cache size from 1 Tb to 10 Gb

# This is the commit message cvat-ai#2:

one domain name insted of two

# This is the commit message cvat-ai#3:

add installation guide

# This is the commit message cvat-ai#2:

delete serverless (nuclio)
@yearlz yearlz mentioned this issue Nov 8, 2021
Closed
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this issue Mar 24, 2022
Open
@il-nietos il-nietos mentioned this issue Mar 7, 2023
Closed
@rragundez rragundez mentioned this issue Jul 11, 2024
Merged
Closed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this issue Oct 29, 2024
Merged
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@bsekachev bsekachev

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Release 0.2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@headdab @bsekachev @nmanovic