Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert float32 pi/2 value to float64 pi/2 value in SimTelEventSource #2077

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2022

Conversation

maxnoe
Copy link
Member

@maxnoe maxnoe commented Sep 21, 2022

This fixes errors that the float32 value of pi/2 is slightly larger than the float64 value of pi/2 and then astropy complains.

@maxnoe maxnoe force-pushed the fix_roundng_error branch 2 times, most recently from f222e8c to 0326e53 Compare September 21, 2022 11:19
@maxnoe maxnoe added this to the v0.17.0 milestone Sep 21, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 21, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 92.47% // Head: 92.47% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (c8c61a1) compared to base (c8c61a1).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head c8c61a1 differs from pull request most recent head 464f742. Consider uploading reports for the commit 464f742 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2077   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.47%   92.47%           
=======================================
  Files         197      197           
  Lines       16276    16276           
=======================================
  Hits        15052    15052           
  Misses       1224     1224           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

kosack
kosack previously approved these changes Sep 21, 2022
nbiederbeck
nbiederbeck previously approved these changes Sep 21, 2022
@maxnoe maxnoe requested a review from LukasNickel September 23, 2022 10:27
@maxnoe
Copy link
Member Author

maxnoe commented Sep 23, 2022

Fixed, please review again @LukasNickel @nbiederbeck

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants