Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

modify_resolve_function #2308

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sxhthreo
Copy link
Contributor

@sxhthreo sxhthreo commented Feb 15, 2024

modified:   examples/scripts/possible_paths.py

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Modified the method of retrieving specific functions in scripts to enhance accuracy.

	modified:   examples/scripts/possible_paths.py
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Feb 15, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 15, 2024

Walkthrough

This update features a pivotal adjustment in how a specific function is retrieved within a script. By transitioning from accessing contract.functions to contract.functions_declared within a list comprehension in the resolve_function function, the modification enhances the precision in function selection, optimizing the script's interaction with contract functionalities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
examples/scripts/.../possible_paths.py Modified attribute access from contract.functions to contract.functions_declared in resolve_function function.

🐇💻
In the realm of code, where functions intertwine,
A small change makes the script more fine.
From .functions to .functions_declared, we hop,
Ensuring the right paths nonstop.
So here's to the change, both big and small,
May it make our coding journey best of all.
🎉🐰

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3dcf1e and 9fd6128.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/scripts/possible_paths.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
examples/scripts/possible_paths.py (2)
  • 22-22: Switching from contract.functions to contract.functions_declared in the list comprehension is a targeted change aimed at refining how functions are retrieved. Ensure that all downstream usages of resolve_function and the functions it interacts with are compatible with this change. This adjustment implies a more specific subset of functions is now being considered, which could affect the script's behavior if it relies on functions not declared within the contract itself but inherited or linked in some other way.
  • 22-22: Given the change to contract.functions_declared, review the logic in resolve_functions, all_function_definitions, __find_target_paths, and find_target_paths to ensure they correctly handle the potentially narrower set of functions now being returned by resolve_function. This is crucial for maintaining the script's accuracy and functionality, especially in complex contract structures with inherited functions.
Verification successful

Given the references to resolve_functions, all_function_definitions, __find_target_paths, and find_target_paths within the possible_paths.py script, it's necessary to review their implementation details to understand how they interact with the list of functions returned by resolve_function. This will help assess the impact of the change from contract.functions to contract.functions_declared on the script's functionality.


The provided script output includes the full content of possible_paths.py, which contains the implementations of resolve_function, resolve_functions, all_function_definitions, __find_target_paths, and find_target_paths. These functions are crucial for understanding the impact of the change from contract.functions to contract.functions_declared in the resolve_function method.

Upon reviewing the implementations:

  • resolve_function: The change to use contract.functions_declared instead of contract.functions is directly reflected in this function. This change narrows down the functions to those declared within the contract itself, excluding inherited functions.

  • resolve_functions: This function resolves a list of function descriptors into function objects by calling resolve_function. The change in resolve_function affects this function indirectly by potentially altering the set of functions it can resolve.

  • all_function_definitions: This function aims to obtain all definitions of a function, including those from base contracts. It uses function.contract.inheritance and c.functions_and_modifiers_declared, which suggests it is designed to work with a comprehensive view of functions, including inherited ones. The change in resolve_function does not directly affect this function, but it's important to note the distinction in function sets being considered.

  • __find_target_paths and find_target_paths: These functions find paths to target functions within a contract's call graph. They rely on all_function_definitions to get a complete view of target functions, including inherited ones. The change in resolve_function does not directly impact these functions, but it's crucial for the initial resolution of target functions.

Given the context and the script's functionality, the change to contract.functions_declared in resolve_function is consistent with the intent to resolve functions declared within a specific contract. However, it's important for users of the script to be aware that this change narrows the scope of resolved functions to those explicitly declared in the contract, excluding inherited functions. This distinction is particularly relevant for scripts or tools that rely on resolving and analyzing contract functions, as it could affect the completeness of their analyses in contexts where inherited functions are significant.

The review comment is verified as the change aligns with the intended functionality, but with the caveat that users must understand the implications of the narrower set of functions being returned by resolve_function.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential impact on functions interacting with resolve_function.
# This script aims to identify if adjustments are necessary in the logic of these functions.
rg "resolve_functions|all_function_definitions|__find_target_paths|find_target_paths" --type py

Length of output: 3563



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the implementation details of the functions for closer review.
fd "possible_paths.py" --exec cat {}

Length of output: 14026

examples/scripts/possible_paths.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@0xalpharush
Copy link
Contributor

Would you sign the CLA and run make reformat please?

@sxhthreo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Would you sign the CLA and run make reformat please?

Sorry, after I signed the CLA, I DON'T know what to do next.

@0xalpharush 0xalpharush mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2024
@0xalpharush
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for fixing! I ran the formatter and merged in #2312

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants