You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's some confusion about the default behavior and prioritization of --exclude-* and --fail-on-* flags. For example, since --fail-on-pedantic is enabled by default, one must pass --exclude-informational --exclude-optimization --no-fail-pedantic to disable informational and optimization level detectors.
This adds a new `fail_on` config option that can be changed with
a mutually exclusive group of argument flags. It also decouples
the exclude_* and fail_on flags, so you can do things like
`fail_on: pedantic` while disabling optimization findings.
Additionally, this adds some new code to detect the old-style
config options, migrate their settings, and alert the user.
Fixescrytic#1458
elopez
added a commit
to elopez/slither
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2022
This adds a new `fail_on` config option that can be changed with
a mutually exclusive group of argument flags. It also decouples
the exclude_* and fail_on flags, so you can do things like
`fail_on: pedantic` while disabling optimization findings.
Additionally, this adds some new code to detect the old-style
config options, migrate their settings, and alert the user.
Fixescrytic#1458
There's some confusion about the default behavior and prioritization of
--exclude-*
and--fail-on-*
flags. For example, since--fail-on-pedantic
is enabled by default, one must pass--exclude-informational --exclude-optimization --no-fail-pedantic
to disable informational and optimization level detectors.Current thinking:
ref: crytic/slither-action#38, #1408
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: