-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 241
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem: ibc incentivization is not integrated #647
Conversation
Closes: crypto-org-chain#642 Solution: - integration ibcfee middleware
This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging f229497 into 21d79ac - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #647 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 32.91% 32.75% -0.17%
==========================================
Files 34 34
Lines 1604 1612 +8
==========================================
Hits 528 528
- Misses 1023 1031 +8
Partials 53 53
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Integration test seems fine. Just a small comment on app wiring.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fee middleware is supposed to be backwards compatible. It'll be better if we also write some tests with incentivized=False
. I ran into some problems with non-fee enabled channels on chain-main
. The issue was faulty app wiring.
I just parameterized the ibc fixture, to run test cases on both cases. |
/runsim |
Closes: #642
Solution:
👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻
PR Checklist:
make
)make test
)go fmt
)golangci-lint run
)go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth
)Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)