Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(secrets): enable user-supplied storage and authproxy secrets #189

Merged

Conversation

andrewazores
Copy link
Member

Fixes #188

@andrewazores andrewazores added the breaking change This change (potentially) breaks API compatibility and requires corresponding changes elsewhere label Sep 6, 2024
@tthvo
Copy link
Member

tthvo commented Sep 17, 2024

I guess we are waiting on response in #187? Maybe we can move forward and when the all changes are merged on main, anyone can pull the latest OCI image?

@andrewazores
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, I say we go ahead. It would be easier for Grzegorz to test anyway if it was merged, I think, and if there are any other fixes required we can do them as separate PRs.

@tthvo
Copy link
Member

tthvo commented Sep 17, 2024

Hmm some issues during rebasing? Some conflicts seem to be reported and the change diffs are a bit odd :D

@andrewazores
Copy link
Member Author

Ah, I think I just rebased it onto main instead of the separate-db-storage branch.

Copy link
Member

@tthvo tthvo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me :D

@andrewazores andrewazores merged commit 9734a59 into cryostatio:separate-db-storage Sep 18, 2024
2 checks passed
@andrewazores andrewazores deleted the user-supplied-secrets branch September 18, 2024 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking change This change (potentially) breaks API compatibility and requires corresponding changes elsewhere feat New feature or request safe-to-test
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants