Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

cc1101 bandwith setting #103

Open
pwwoj opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

cc1101 bandwith setting #103

pwwoj opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@pwwoj
Copy link

pwwoj commented Dec 14, 2023

I've compiled project for esp32/cc1101 with latest radio library and it seems that rxBandwidth setting of 250000 does not pass validity checks. Below clacs from spec , so it looks like some container with predefined values might be used - I have succesfully used defualt 203000 or 270000 as well.
image
@andyboeh
Copy link
Contributor

I just ran into the same issue. Looks like the config option for the Rx bandwidth is already there but it is not (yet) supported by the web interface. Changing the default to 270000 initializes the module properly.

gpvelzen added a commit to gpvelzen/RFLink32 that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2024
@gpvelzen
Update 1_Radio.cpp
06fd8f1 
Hardware malfunction for CC1101 - defect cpainchaud#103
On the serial connection (pio run -e genericESP32 -t monitor) we see continuously:

Now trying to initialize hardware 'CC1101'
Initialized CC1101(freq=433.92Mhz,br=9.600kbps,rxbw=250.0khz)=-104
CC1101 SetOOK(true)=0
CC1101 setPromiscuousMode(true)=0
CC1101 disableSyncWordFiltering(true)=0
Hardware failed to initialize, we will retry later!
Follow instructions here to solve this: cpainchaud#103.

Change ../RFLink32/RFLink/1_Radio.cpp to have default_rxBandwidth = 203000; instead of default_rxBandwidth = 250000;.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@andyboeh @pwwoj