Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Designate LB.1.3.2 (C25413T), MH.1 (Alias of B.1.1.529.2.86.1.1.9.2.1…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
….3.2.1, S:T572I)
  • Loading branch information
corneliusroemer committed Jul 10, 2024
1 parent 641e5fc commit 0aa996e
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 189 additions and 19 deletions.
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions lineage_notes.txt
205 changes: 186 additions & 19 deletions lineages.csv
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions pango_designation/alias_key.json

3 comments on commit 0aa996e

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor

@xz-keg xz-keg commented on 0aa996e Jul 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This designation seems ambigious. There isn't an C25413T branch under LB.1.3, however there is a C24844T branch and a C24844T+S:T572I branch.

Looking at the seqs, it seems that this designation follows C24844T instead of C25413T.
Please fix the lineage note.

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

@FedeGueli FedeGueli commented on 0aa996e Jul 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should be designated starting from S:T572I , now it has left too much of the tree undesignated:
Screenshot 2024-07-10 alle 15 48 44
cc @AngieHinrichs @corneliusroemer

see :sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals#1583

@Over-There-Is
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This designation seems ambigious. There isn't an C25413T branch under LB.1.3, however there is a C24844T branch and a C24844T+S:T572I branch.

Looking at the seqs, it seems that this designation follows C24844T instead of C25413T. Please fix the lineage note.

and this branch even has a subbranch with C25413T.

Please sign in to comment.