Removing the only consumer chain

[mpoke]

ref.

• Unbonding ops are put on hold even w/o consumer chains #118 (comment)

what happens theoretically if the unbonding is put on hold while child chains exist, but then child chain gets removed with gov proposal before hold is lifted?

[danwt]

Can we make this issue actionable, or define a closing criteria?

[mpoke]

Can we make this issue actionable, or define a closing criteria?

The implementation should follow the fix in the spec cosmos/ibc#770

[mpoke]

Already fixed by

interchain-security/x/ccv/provider/keeper/proposal.go

Line 84 in d059b86

if len(unbondingOp.UnbondingConsumerChains) == 0 {

. @danwt Could you please confirm this?

[danwt]

@mpoke just from that line it seems like it. Do you have a situation or complication in mind?

[mpoke]

No, this was the scenario we wanted to handle, i.e., stoping a consumer chain that was the only chain an unbonding op was waiting for.

[danwt]

It seems fine.