Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use fully qualified typeURL interface names in protos #3165

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 21, 2023

Conversation

crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

Description

closes: #2977

Commit Message / Changelog Entry

chore: use fully qualified typeURL interface names in protos

see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a commit message to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer.
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

Copy link
Member

@damiannolan damiannolan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@chatton chatton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@colin-axner colin-axner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Do we need manual changelog entries still?

@crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nice! Do we need manual changelog entries still?

No need now. But we still have some evaluation to do about the process for changelog generation after we do the next tag.

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega merged commit bd053b2 into main Feb 21, 2023
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega deleted the carlos/2977-clean-up-acceptimplement_interface branch February 21, 2023 08:48
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2023
colin-axner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2023
@faddat faddat mentioned this pull request Jun 23, 2023
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

clean up {accept,implement}_interface
4 participants