-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 585
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: emit cumulative fees when incentivizing a packet multiple times #1391
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
acda4e9
emit cumulative fees
colin-axner dabac81
test: add test for emission of cumulative incentivized fees
colin-axner 87ba078
add check for nil relayer
colin-axner 305baa2
Merge branch 'main' into colin/1327-emit-cumulative-fees
colin-axner a485264
reassign sdk.Coins, fix bug
colin-axner a999da7
Merge branch 'colin/1327-emit-cumulative-fees' of github.com:cosmos/i…
colin-axner File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ | ||
package keeper_test | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
sdk "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types" | ||
abcitypes "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/abci/types" | ||
|
||
"github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/v3/modules/apps/29-fee/types" | ||
) | ||
|
||
func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) TestIncentivizePacketEvent() { | ||
var ( | ||
expRecvFees sdk.Coins | ||
expAckFees sdk.Coins | ||
expTimeoutFees sdk.Coins | ||
) | ||
|
||
suite.coordinator.Setup(suite.path) | ||
|
||
fee := types.NewFee(defaultRecvFee, defaultAckFee, defaultTimeoutFee) | ||
msg := types.NewMsgPayPacketFee( | ||
fee, | ||
suite.path.EndpointA.ChannelConfig.PortID, | ||
suite.path.EndpointA.ChannelID, | ||
suite.chainA.SenderAccount.GetAddress().String(), | ||
nil, | ||
) | ||
|
||
expRecvFees.Add(fee.RecvFee...) | ||
expAckFees.Add(fee.AckFee...) | ||
expAckFees.Add(fee.TimeoutFee...) | ||
|
||
result, err := suite.chainA.SendMsgs(msg) | ||
suite.Require().NoError(err) | ||
|
||
var incentivizedPacketEvent abcitypes.Event | ||
for _, event := range result.Events { | ||
if event.Type == types.EventTypeIncentivizedPacket { | ||
incentivizedPacketEvent = event | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
for _, attr := range incentivizedPacketEvent.Attributes { | ||
switch string(attr.Key) { | ||
case types.AttributeKeyRecvFee: | ||
suite.Require().Equal(expRecvFees.String(), string(attr.Value)) | ||
|
||
case types.AttributeKeyAckFee: | ||
suite.Require().Equal(expAckFees.String(), string(attr.Value)) | ||
|
||
case types.AttributeKeyTimeoutFee: | ||
suite.Require().Equal(expTimeoutFees.String(), string(attr.Value)) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
// send the same messages again a few times | ||
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ { | ||
expRecvFees.Add(fee.RecvFee...) | ||
expAckFees.Add(fee.AckFee...) | ||
expAckFees.Add(fee.TimeoutFee...) | ||
|
||
result, err = suite.chainA.SendMsgs(msg) | ||
suite.Require().NoError(err) | ||
} | ||
|
||
for _, event := range result.Events { | ||
if event.Type == types.EventTypeIncentivizedPacket { | ||
incentivizedPacketEvent = event | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
for _, attr := range incentivizedPacketEvent.Attributes { | ||
switch string(attr.Key) { | ||
case types.AttributeKeyRecvFee: | ||
suite.Require().Equal(expRecvFees.String(), string(attr.Value)) | ||
|
||
case types.AttributeKeyAckFee: | ||
suite.Require().Equal(expAckFees.String(), string(attr.Value)) | ||
|
||
case types.AttributeKeyTimeoutFee: | ||
suite.Require().Equal(expTimeoutFees.String(), string(attr.Value)) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we reassign as
coins.Add(...)
returnssdk.Coins
?I think this needs to be done for the singular
coin.Add()
function. Not 100% sure aboutCoins
but may be good practise to keep consistent and handle return value.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
seems like a good idea to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice catch 🐛 - the tests were using an expected value of "", the lack of reassigning didn't change the variable values