-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
REVIEW: Change from glide to dep #509
Conversation
Whoa big move switching to dep - is there a discussion documented somewhere as to why we want to do this? If we're making this move we should also outline in the |
Will update tendermint coding. But I've put in pull requests across the entire tendermint/cosmos repository surface area and CI passes on all of them. Let's discuss during the next team meeting but my goal here was to provide proof that we could painlessly switch to dep from glide. |
cool let's do it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Co-authored-by: Matt Kocubinski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Marko <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: samricotta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
* ci * lints and remove some unnecessary CI jobs * update tests go mod * more lints * remove denom owners since not implemented in osmosis * more lints * fix test values * implement nolint again * more test fixes * add back labeler as v4 * remove tabs and slash * update json to const * move file locations * push * fix seq num issue * Update tests/e2e/auth/vesting/suite.go * add back pwd * remove sonarcloud --------- Co-authored-by: Matt, Park <[email protected]>
Switch Glide to dep for dependency resolution