Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

organize ADR directory like tendermint's #2693

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 5, 2018
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
# Architecture Decision Records (ADR)

This is a location to record all high-level architecture decisions in the cosmos-sdk project.
This is a location to record all high-level architecture decisions in the Cosmos SDK project.

You can read more about the ADR concept in this [blog post](https://product.reverb.com/documenting-architecture-decisions-the-reverb-way-a3563bb24bd0#.78xhdix6t).
You can read more about the ADR concept in this [blog post](https://product.reverb.com/documenting-architecture-decisions-the-reverb-way-a3563bb24bd0#.78xhdix6t). See the [tendermint ADRs](https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/tree/master/docs/architecture) for examples.

An ADR should provide:

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,20 +4,23 @@
* {date}: {changelog}

## Context
> This section contains all the context one needs to understand the current state, and why there is a problem. It should be as succinct as possible and introduce the high level idea behind the solution.

> This section contains all the context one needs to understand the current state, and why there is a problem. It should be as succinct as possible and introduce the high level idea behind the solution.
## Decision

> This section explains all of the details of the proposed solution, including implementation details.
It should also describe affects / corollary items that may need to be changed as a part of this.
If the proposed change will be large, please also indicate a way to do the change to maximize ease of review.
(e.g. the optimal split of things to do between separate PR's)

## Status

> A decision may be "proposed" if it hasn't been agreed upon yet, or "accepted" once it is agreed upon. If a later ADR changes or reverses a decision, it may be marked as "deprecated" or "superseded" with a reference to its replacement.

{Deprecated|Proposed|Accepted}

## Consequences

> This section describes the consequences, after applying the decision. All consequences should be summarized here, not just the "positive" ones.

### Positive
Expand All @@ -27,6 +30,7 @@ If the proposed change will be large, please also indicate a way to do the chang
### Neutral

## References

> Are there any relevant PR comments, issues that led up to this, or articles referrenced for why we made the given design choice? If so link them here!

* {reference link}