Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: readme #23183

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

docs: readme #23183

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

operagxoksana
Copy link

@operagxoksana operagxoksana commented Jan 5, 2025

Hey. added a link in the documentation, please review

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added GitHub Actions workflow status badges for "Sims" and "Lint" workflows
    • Improved README visibility of project's continuous integration processes
    • Provided direct links to workflow status pages

@operagxoksana operagxoksana requested a review from a team as a code owner January 5, 2025 07:18
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 5, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves updating the README.md file by adding two new GitHub Actions workflow status badges. These badges provide direct links to the "Sims" and "Lint" workflow pages, enhancing the project's documentation by offering quick visibility into the continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes directly from the repository's main README.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added two new GitHub Actions workflow badges:
- Sims workflow status badge
- Lint workflow status badge

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • julienrbrt
  • tac0turtle
  • testinginprod

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 07d5168 and 9f664bb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
README.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

31-35: LGTM! The badge additions enhance documentation.

The new badges for Sims and Lint workflows:

  • Are properly placed within the badges section
  • Follow the existing badge style pattern
  • Provide useful CI/CD status information
  • Have appropriate alt text for accessibility

31-35: Verify workflow links.

Let's verify that both workflow files exist and are accessible.

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify the content of these workflow files to ensure they match with the badges shown in the README.


Workflow files are valid and correctly referenced

The verification confirms that:

  • Both workflow files exist in .github/workflows/
  • The workflow names match the badges in README.md ("Sims" and "Lint")
  • The workflow configurations are valid GitHub Actions workflows
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the workflow files exist in the repository
# Expected: Both workflow files should exist

echo "Checking workflow files..."
for workflow in "sims.yml" "lint.yml"; do
  if [ -f ".github/workflows/$workflow" ]; then
    echo "$workflow exists"
  else
    echo "$workflow not found"
  fi
done

Length of output: 312


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of both workflow files to verify they are the correct workflows
echo "=== Content of sims.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/sims.yml | head -n 5
echo -e "\n=== Content of lint.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/lint.yml | head -n 5

Length of output: 510

Comment on lines +31 to 35
<a href="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/actions/workflows/sims.yml">
<img alt="Sims" src="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/workflows/Sims/badge.svg" />
<a href="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/actions/workflows/lint.yml">
<img alt="Lint Status" src="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/workflows/Lint/badge.svg" />
</div>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix missing closing anchor tag.

The second anchor tag <a> for the Lint Status badge is missing its closing tag </a>.

Apply this fix:

  <a href="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/actions/workflows/lint.yml">   
    <img alt="Lint Status" src="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/workflows/Lint/badge.svg" />
+  </a>
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<a href="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/actions/workflows/sims.yml">
<img alt="Sims" src="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/workflows/Sims/badge.svg" />
<a href="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/actions/workflows/lint.yml">
<img alt="Lint Status" src="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/workflows/Lint/badge.svg" />
</div>
<a href="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/actions/workflows/sims.yml">
<img alt="Sims" src="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/workflows/Sims/badge.svg" />
<a href="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/actions/workflows/lint.yml">
<img alt="Lint Status" src="https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/workflows/Lint/badge.svg" />
</a>
</div>

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

Hey! I do not think this is necessary. Thanks for your contribution.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt closed this Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants