Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update go module link #22003

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

beepdeepor
Copy link
Contributor

@beepdeepor beepdeepor commented Oct 1, 2024

Description

The Go module link https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Modules#is-it-possible-to-add-a-module-to-a-multi-module-repository in CONTRIBUTING.md is no longer work now

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the CONTRIBUTING.md file to clarify the contribution process.
    • Revised the table of contents for improved navigation.
    • Enhanced sections on dependencies, development procedures, and pull request processes.
    • Introduced a draft PR stage for early feedback and outlined responsibilities for pull request owners and reviewers.
    • Structured the concept and feature approval process into distinct stages with defined timelines.

@beepdeepor beepdeepor requested a review from a team as a code owner October 1, 2024 12:53
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 1, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The CONTRIBUTING.md file has been updated to improve the clarity of the contribution process for the Cosmos SDK. Key changes include an updated table of contents, revisions to the dependencies section, elaboration on the development procedure, and a detailed pull request process. Responsibilities of pull request owners and reviewers have been expanded, and the external contributor guidelines have been clarified. The approval process for concepts and features has been structured into defined stages with timelines.

Changes

File Change Summary
CONTRIBUTING.md Structural and content modifications for clarity, including updates to the table of contents, dependencies, development procedures, pull request process, accountability of reviewers, external contributor guidelines, and approval process stages.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

backport/v0.52.x

Suggested reviewers

  • julienrbrt
  • sontrinh16

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 52d8b2e and 3e8d784.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CONTRIBUTING.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

🔇 Additional comments (4)
CONTRIBUTING.md (4)

239-239: Approved: Go Modules link update

The update to the Go Modules documentation link is correct and necessary. This change ensures that contributors have access to the most current information on Go Modules.


303-303: Approved: Added multi-module repository information

The addition of information about the Cosmos SDK being a multi-module repository is valuable. It provides important context for contributors and helps them understand the project's structure.


Line range hint 1-303: Confirmed: Changes align with PR objectives

The updates to the CONTRIBUTING.md file, including the Go module link update and the addition of multi-module repository information, align well with the PR objectives. These changes improve the document's accuracy and informativeness.


Line range hint 1-303: LGTM: Approved changes to CONTRIBUTING.md

The updates to the CONTRIBUTING.md file, including the Go module link update and the addition of multi-module repository information, are well-integrated and improve the document. The changes are minimal yet impactful, enhancing the guidance for contributors without disrupting the existing content.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants