-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(math): Testing Sub for GDA Dec Type #20626
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Base branches to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good progress. You found a lot of good test cases. Especially at the upper/lower exp borders.
I would love to remove the constraints at this stage to have simpler method signatures. Also rounding should be handled.
Not an easy task 💪
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good progress. 💪
We should change the notation to either 10^exp
or use the 1e
notation to be correct
require.NoError(t, gotErr) | ||
assert.Equal(t, spec.exp, got) | ||
assert.True(t, spec.exp.Equal(got)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 easier to read
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice!
It would be good to remove the debug output and replace all 1^
by 1e
notation.
math/dec_test.go
Outdated
} | ||
for name, spec := range specs { | ||
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) { | ||
got, gotErr := spec.x.Sub(spec.y) | ||
if name == "precision too high: src exponent below limit" { | ||
fmt.Println(spec.x, spec.y, spec.exp, got, gotErr) | ||
if name == "1^-100000 - -1 -> 0.000..01" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no debug output please. If you need more verbose failure messages, then it is is the best to add them to the assert lines.
Description
Due to the large amount of tests for Dec I've split up the PR into each function for #20536
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...