-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: add overflow test for coin Add #19344
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent update introduces enhancements to handle large integer calculations more accurately by incorporating the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
{sdk.NewInt64Coin(testDenom1, 1), sdk.NewInt64Coin(testDenom1, 1), sdk.NewInt64Coin(testDenom1, 2), false}, | ||
{sdk.NewInt64Coin(testDenom1, 1), sdk.NewInt64Coin(testDenom1, 0), sdk.NewInt64Coin(testDenom1, 1), false}, | ||
{sdk.NewInt64Coin(testDenom1, 1), sdk.NewInt64Coin(testDenom2, 1), sdk.NewInt64Coin(testDenom1, 1), true}, | ||
|
||
// addition cannot lead to a number with more than 256 bits | ||
{sdk.NewCoin(testDenom1, maxUint256), sdk.NewCoin(testDenom1, math.NewInt(0)), sdk.NewCoin(testDenom1, maxUint256), false}, | ||
{sdk.NewCoin(testDenom1, maxUint256), sdk.NewCoin(testDenom1, math.NewInt(1)), sdk.NewInt64Coin(testDenom1, 1), true}, | ||
} | ||
|
||
for tcIndex, tc := range cases { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [160-175]
The test case for checking overflow in coin addition does not assert or check for an overflow error directly. Instead, it relies on the shouldPanic
flag to determine if an overflow occurred. This approach might not accurately capture overflow scenarios, especially if the Add
method is modified to return an error instead of panicking.
- // Current implementation relies on panic for overflow detection
+ // Suggestion: Implement and check for an explicit overflow error from the Add method
Description
theres no check for when we add coins that values go above 2**256. PR adds such a test.
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit