-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(x/staking): Refactor GetLastValidators #19226
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -383,13 +383,19 @@ func (k Keeper) GetLastValidators(ctx context.Context) (validators []types.Valid | |
if err != nil { | ||
return nil, err | ||
} | ||
validators = make([]types.Validator, maxValidators) | ||
|
||
i := 0 | ||
validators = make([]types.Validator, maxValidators) | ||
|
||
err = k.LastValidatorPower.Walk(ctx, nil, func(key []byte, _ gogotypes.Int64Value) (bool, error) { | ||
// sanity check | ||
// Note, we do NOT error here as the MaxValidators param may change via on-chain | ||
// governance. In cases where the param is increased, this case should never | ||
// be hit. In cases where the param is decreased, we will simply not return | ||
// the remainder of the validator set, as the ApplyAndReturnValidatorSetUpdates | ||
// call should ensure the validators past the cliff will be moved to the | ||
// unbonding set. | ||
if i >= int(maxValidators) { | ||
return true, fmt.Errorf("more validators than maxValidators found") | ||
return true, nil | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. i dont think this is correct, we should add a test case to make sure the validators have entered the unbond queue. We could leave the state machine in a weird limbo if they are still in the bonded queue There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yup -- on it |
||
} | ||
|
||
validator, err := k.GetValidator(ctx, key) | ||
Comment on lines
383
to
401
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The refactored - validators = make([]types.Validator, maxValidators)
+ if maxValidators == 0 {
+ return []types.Validator{}, nil
+ }
+ validators = make([]types.Validator, maxValidators) |
||
|
@@ -399,6 +405,7 @@ func (k Keeper) GetLastValidators(ctx context.Context) (validators []types.Valid | |
|
||
validators[i] = validator | ||
i++ | ||
|
||
return false, nil | ||
}) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The entry for the server module fix mentions a consensus failure but does not specify the nature of the fix. It would be beneficial to include a brief description of how the issue was resolved.
Consider adding a short description of the fix applied to address the consensus failure issue.