fix: add TYPE back to staking infraction

[shaspitz]

Description

Closes: #XXXX

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[tac0turtle]

hey thanks for opening a pr. Could you write a short description on why this change is being proposed ?

[MSalopek]

hey thanks for opening a pr. Could you write a short description on why this change is being proposed ?

Opening an issue and also expanding the solution and the PR description.

EDIT:
Issue opened with explanation. Please let me know if my explanation is lacking.
#16740

EDIT 2:
New PR: #16742

[shaspitz]

Closing in favor of Matija's PR with better documentation #16742