-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: duration renderer for SIGN_MODE_TEXTUAL #13312
feat: duration renderer for SIGN_MODE_TEXTUAL #13312
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM overall, thanks @JimLarson. One comment is whether we need to normalize Durations, or simply check that the input durations are valid.
dur.Seconds *= -1 | ||
dur.Nanos *= -1 | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about calling dur.CheckValid
just to be sure our algo was correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Outside the scope of Parse()
. It doesn't need to handle anything outside of data formatted from a valid proto.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
gosec found more than 10 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some final small nits. I'll get a 2nd approval from the SDK team, and we can merge this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
@JimLarson Could you rebase/merge main, or give maintainers write access to your branch so that we can do it for you? |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
75f1184
to
837b72e
Compare
837b72e
to
08731fe
Compare
@AmauryM or @julienrbrt please reenable the automerge. Thanks! |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #13312 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 54.05% 53.97% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 653 648 -5
Lines 55899 55425 -474
==========================================
- Hits 30216 29915 -301
+ Misses 23269 23111 -158
+ Partials 2414 2399 -15
|
Description
Closes: #12710
Adds SIGN_MODE_TEXTUAL value renderer for google.protobuf.Duration messages.
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
(CHANGELOG intentionally unmodified - will be updated with the whole epic)
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking change