Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate x/staking to use app wiring #12036

Closed
4 tasks done
Tracked by #11899
tac0turtle opened this issue May 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
4 tasks done
Tracked by #11899

migrate x/staking to use app wiring #12036

tac0turtle opened this issue May 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

tac0turtle commented May 25, 2022

Open questions:

  • what does the staking module look like if its own go.mod? what other modules need to be tied with it. @zmanian has some input here
@tac0turtle tac0turtle changed the title x/staking migrate x/staking to use app wiring May 25, 2022
@tac0turtle tac0turtle moved this to 📝 Todo in Cosmos-SDK May 25, 2022
@blushi blushi moved this from 📝 Todo to 💪 In Progress in Cosmos-SDK Jun 2, 2022
@JeancarloBarrios JeancarloBarrios moved this from 💪 In Progress to 👀 Needs Review in Cosmos-SDK Jun 3, 2022
@JeancarloBarrios JeancarloBarrios moved this from 👀 Needs Review to 💪 In Progress in Cosmos-SDK Jun 3, 2022
@JeancarloBarrios
Copy link
Contributor

JeancarloBarrios commented Jun 3, 2022

@JeancarloBarrios JeancarloBarrios moved this from 💪 In Progress to 👀 Needs Review in Cosmos-SDK Jun 3, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2022
## Description
Migrate x/staking to the new app wiring (dependency injection).

Tracking progress at #12036

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [x] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
@blushi blushi moved this from 👀 Needs Review to 📝 Todo in Cosmos-SDK Jun 3, 2022
@JeancarloBarrios JeancarloBarrios moved this from 📝 Todo to 💪 In Progress in Cosmos-SDK Jun 6, 2022
@JeancarloBarrios JeancarloBarrios moved this from 💪 In Progress to 👀 Needs Review in Cosmos-SDK Jun 6, 2022
@blushi blushi moved this from 👀 Needs Review to 📝 Todo in Cosmos-SDK Jun 8, 2022
@tac0turtle tac0turtle moved this from 📝 Todo to 💪 In Progress in Cosmos-SDK Jun 9, 2022
@julienrbrt julienrbrt moved this from 💪 In Progress to 📝 Todo in Cosmos-SDK Jun 17, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
## Description

Ref #12036 
Depends on app wiring for x/distribution getting merged first (#12292)



---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
@julienrbrt julienrbrt moved this from 📝 Todo to 💪 In Progress in Cosmos-SDK Jun 22, 2022
@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member Author

closing as completed

Repository owner moved this from 💪 In Progress to 👏 Done in Cosmos-SDK Jun 30, 2022
larry0x pushed a commit to larry0x/cosmos-sdk that referenced this issue May 22, 2023
## Description

Ref cosmos#12036 
Depends on app wiring for x/distribution getting merged first (cosmos#12292)



---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants