Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add time to simulation ctx #10466

Closed
4 tasks
fkneeland-figure opened this issue Oct 29, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #10467
Closed
4 tasks

Add time to simulation ctx #10466

fkneeland-figure opened this issue Oct 29, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #10467

Comments

@fkneeland-figure
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Bug

When running simulation tests with wasmd I am running into this error: https://github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd/blob/14e58bfa81ea2ade0ff00ebd067ac0bc75e37cf8/x/wasm/types/types.go#L258

This is because when we are running in simulation mode we don't populate the BlockTime field on the ctx:

ctx: sdk.NewContext(ms, header, true, app.logger).WithMinGasPrices(app.minGasPrices),
and
ctx, _ = ctx.CacheContext()

Version

Steps to Reproduce


For Admin Use

  • Not duplicate issue
  • Appropriate labels applied
  • Appropriate contributors tagged
  • Contributor assigned/self-assigned
@mergify mergify bot closed this as completed in #10467 Nov 9, 2021
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 9, 2021
<!--
The default pull request template is for types feat, fix, or refactor.
For other templates, add one of the following parameters to the url:
- template=docs.md
- template=other.md
-->

## Description

When running simulation tests with wasmd I am running into this error: https://github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd/blob/14e58bfa81ea2ade0ff00ebd067ac0bc75e37cf8/x/wasm/types/types.go#L258

This is because when we are running in simulation mode we randomly create a date before the year 9999.  However, if a date is after the year 2262 `UnixNano` will overflow and possibly return a negative number.  To fix this I updated how we set the random genesis start time to be between the epoch and 200 years from now which means this error won't show itself again for another 40+ years. 

Closes: #10466 

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review. -->

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [x] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [x] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
blewater pushed a commit to e-money/cosmos-sdk that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2021
<!--
The default pull request template is for types feat, fix, or refactor.
For other templates, add one of the following parameters to the url:
- template=docs.md
- template=other.md
-->

## Description

When running simulation tests with wasmd I am running into this error: https://github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd/blob/14e58bfa81ea2ade0ff00ebd067ac0bc75e37cf8/x/wasm/types/types.go#L258

This is because when we are running in simulation mode we randomly create a date before the year 9999.  However, if a date is after the year 2262 `UnixNano` will overflow and possibly return a negative number.  To fix this I updated how we set the random genesis start time to be between the epoch and 200 years from now which means this error won't show itself again for another 40+ years. 

Closes: cosmos#10466 

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review. -->

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [x] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [x] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant