Mobilenet integration #794
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I can rebase on master and remove the fixup_batchnorms hack if this is still relevant. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#793 is prerequsite for this, closes #773
There's a very ugly hack with
fixup_batchnormsthat won't be necessary once #485 is resolved. There's also some type-level voodoo inblock.rsto keep the actual model definition looking nice, but I could also just split the 5 kinds of blocks each into their own type.For
SqueezeAndExciteblocks my original idea was that I'd be able to just useLinearbecause as far as I understand, a 2d conv over a Nx1x1 volume is just a linear operation, but maybe I need to transform the weights while saving or maybe there's something I don't understand.