feat: add support for struct and map fields

[piksel]

Adds additional configuration field types for service configs.
Ref #73

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #137 (6f2e6b0) into main (ce75958) will decrease coverage by 4.16%.
The diff coverage is 75.65%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #137      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.93%   61.77%   -4.17%     
==========================================
  Files          56       62       +6     
  Lines        1371     1758     +387     
==========================================
+ Hits          904     1086     +182     
- Misses        386      561     +175     
- Partials       81      111      +30     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/format/format.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/format/formatter.go	57.89% <76.99%> (ø)
pkg/format/enum_formatter.go	60.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/format/prop_key_resolver.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/format/format_colorize.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/format/format_query.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ce75958...6f2e6b0. Read the comment docs.

[JonasPf]

I ran into some problems with using gingko to run the tests:

$ ginkgo -r

Summarizing 6 Failures:

[Fail] the format package SetConfigField when formatting stuct values when setting and formatting [It] should format signed integers identical to input
/Users/jonas/projects/blockdaemon/shoutrrr/pkg/format/format_test.go:236

[Fail] the format package SetConfigField when formatting stuct values when setting and formatting [It] should format unsigned integers identical to input
/Users/jonas/projects/blockdaemon/shoutrrr/pkg/format/format_test.go:236

[Fail] the format package SetConfigField when formatting stuct values when setting and formatting [It] should format enums identical to input
/Users/jonas/projects/blockdaemon/shoutrrr/pkg/format/format_test.go:236

[Fail] the format package SetConfigField when formatting stuct values when setting and formatting [It] should format string slices identical to input
/Users/jonas/projects/blockdaemon/shoutrrr/pkg/format/format_test.go:236

[Fail] the format package SetConfigField when formatting stuct values when setting and formatting [It] should format string arrays identical to input
/Users/jonas/projects/blockdaemon/shoutrrr/pkg/format/format_test.go:236

[Fail] the format package SetConfigField when formatting stuct values when setting and formatting [It] should format prop struct slices identical to input
/Users/jonas/projects/blockdaemon/shoutrrr/pkg/format/format_test.go:236

Curiously it works when I run them using go test ./... (same as the CI). Anything I'm doing wrong with ginkgo?

[piksel]

It's due to the color support. When running with go test it detects the output as not being a TTY and strips the color codes from the output, but this does not happen with ginkgo. I usually use go test to run, so I hadn't noticed this. I should update the tests to always strip the color information (since that is neither that important, nor what the tests are actually trying to verify here).

Expected
      <string>: \x1b[94m-45\x1b[0m
  to equal
      <string>: -45