Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix podman network IDs handling #9455

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2021

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Feb 21, 2021

The libpod network logic knows about networks IDs but OCICNI
does not. We cannot pass the network ID to OCICNI. Instead we
need to make sure we only use network names internally. This
is also important for libpod since we also only store the
network names in the state. If we would add a ID there the
same networks could accidentally be added twice.

Fixes #9451

@Luap99 Luap99 requested review from mheon and baude February 21, 2021 15:41
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 21, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 21, 2021

LGTM

@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Feb 21, 2021

Note: It looks like previously you could do podman create with a non existing network. This is no longer possible with this commit. I think it is required to validate the network at create time as we should never leak network IDs into the state.
I am not sure if we should backport this because it could break user workflows.

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Feb 21, 2021 via email

@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Feb 21, 2021

I added a SkipIfRemote for the tests. It just flaked to much. I have another PR to fix this. see cri-o/ocicni#85 and #9449.
Interestingly it only flaked on on fedora and not ubuntu. @baude FYI

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@baude PTAL

The libpod network logic knows about networks IDs but OCICNI
does not. We cannot pass the network ID to OCICNI. Instead we
need to make sure we only use network names internally. This
is also important for libpod since we also only store the
network names in the state. If we would add a ID there the
same networks could accidentally be added twice.

Fixes containers#9451

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Feb 22, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 22, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d999328 into containers:master Feb 22, 2021
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the fix-network-ids branch February 22, 2021 22:16
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Error when passing network id for connecting a network to a container
7 participants