-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix for compatibility volume creation #7804
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: baude The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
e2b4368
to
4cace31
Compare
Just tested and this solves #7740 for me |
I love bug for bug compatibility. |
in the compatibility layer, creating a volume with a name that already does not result in an error. instead a 201 response with the existing volume's information is returned. while it seems like a bug on the part of docker and they agree, no attempt has been made to fix it in five years. See moby/moby#16068 Fixes: containers#7740 Signed-off-by: baude <[email protected]>
LGTM |
LGTM |
/lgtm |
/lgtm |
in the compatibility layer, creating a volume with a name that already does not result in an error. instead a 201 response with the existing volume's information is returned. while it seems like a bug on the part of docker and they agree, no attempt has been made to fix it in five years. See moby/moby#16068
Fixes: #7740
Signed-off-by: baude [email protected]