Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a bug where --pids-limit was parsed incorrectly #6910

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2020

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Jul 8, 2020

The --pids-limit flag was using strconv.ParseInt with bad arguments, resulting in it being unable to parse standard integers (1024, for example, would produce an 'out of range' error).

Change the arguments to make sense (base 10, max 32-bit) and add a test to ensure we don't regress again.

Fixes #6908

Currently only against v2.0 branch, as it looks like changes that caused this have not landed in master yet.

@mheon mheon force-pushed the fix_out_of_range branch 2 times, most recently from 32c7634 to 10a3fc7 Compare July 8, 2020 18:09
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jul 8, 2020

Oops
LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Jul 8, 2020

@rhatdan You want me to PR this into your branch for pidslimit?

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jul 8, 2020

@mheon I fixed the main branch PR for pids-limit.

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jul 9, 2020

This is waiting on #6906

The --pids-limit flag was using strconv.ParseInt with bad
arguments, resulting in it being unable to parse standard
integers (1024, for example, would produce an 'out of range'
error).

Change the arguments to make sense (base 10, max 32-bit) and
add a test to ensure we don't regress again.

Fixes containers#6908

Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
@mheon mheon force-pushed the fix_out_of_range branch from 10a3fc7 to 9810e58 Compare July 15, 2020 14:04
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 15, 2020
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Jul 15, 2020

Rebased atop latest v2.0, this should go green

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 15, 2020
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 15, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2a36096 into containers:v2.0 Jul 15, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants