Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support podman ps filter regular expressions #3599

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2019

Conversation

QiWang19
Copy link
Contributor

@QiWang19 QiWang19 commented Jul 18, 2019

Close #3394
bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731107

podman ps --filter use regexp to match the container name.

Signed-off-by: Qi Wang [email protected]

podman ps --filter use regexp to match the container name.

Signed-off-by: Qi Wang <[email protected]>
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jul 18, 2019

/approve

Thanks for the speedy response here

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon, QiWang19

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 18, 2019
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jul 18, 2019

I wonder if we need more than this - we might need to use regexp matching for all filters? Should test against Docker to determine.

@QiWang19
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think no other filters need regular expression after looking through the filters that in common with docker.

Expect(session.ExitCode()).To(Equal(0))
fullCid := session.OutputToString()

session2 := podmanTest.Podman([]string{"run", "-d", "--name", "test11", ALPINE, "top"})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like it should fail, I think this should be named test2.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Never mind, I guess it is test11.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jul 19, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 19, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 398aeac into containers:master Jul 19, 2019
@QiWang19 QiWang19 deleted the ps-regexp branch June 26, 2020 15:11
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support podman ps filter regular expressions like in docker CLI
5 participants