Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

runtime: unlock the alive lock only once #3208

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2019

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Unlock the alive lock only once in the deferred func call.

Fixes: #3207
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS labels May 28, 2019
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@giuseppe PTAL

@@ -891,7 +888,6 @@ func makeRuntime(ctx context.Context, runtime *Runtime) (err error) {
// no containers running. Create immediately a namespace, as
// we will need to access the storage.
if os.Geteuid() != 0 {
aliveLock.Unlock()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think think will cause a deadlock. BecomeRootInUserNS will cause a re-exec, and will wait for the new process to terminate. But that won't happen as the new process will also try to get a lock on the "alive" file

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ouch, that sounds like deadlock. Thanks for the hint! I'll fix that up and ping after repush.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need to set locked = false to avoid the double unlock?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be better now. WDYT?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, thanks for the fix. LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented May 28, 2019

Code LGTM. Gating's exploding though.

Unlock the alive lock only once in the deferred func call.

Fixes: containers#3207
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -891,7 +888,6 @@ func makeRuntime(ctx context.Context, runtime *Runtime) (err error) {
// no containers running. Create immediately a namespace, as
// we will need to access the storage.
if os.Geteuid() != 0 {
aliveLock.Unlock()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, thanks for the fix. LGTM

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

Given the two LGTMs...
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vrothberg: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

In response to this:

Given the two LGTMs...
/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented May 28, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 28, 2019
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@vrothberg: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

Ha, if the bot would know ...

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit bc7afd6 into containers:master May 28, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

podman info fails without sudo
5 participants