Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

container: pass StopTimeout to the systemd slice #23064

Conversation

giuseppe
Copy link
Member

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Now Podman specifies the StopTimeout to systemd, so that it is honored when systemd stops the scope

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 21, 2024
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 21, 2024

LGTM
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You commit message says systemd slice in the title but is sets it on the scope.
Is that correct or should it say scope?

libpod/container_internal_common.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@giuseppe giuseppe force-pushed the podman-pass-timeout-stop-to-systemd branch from 29d4d0e to acab826 Compare June 21, 2024 09:17
so that they are honored when systemd terminates the scope.

Closes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-16375

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
@giuseppe giuseppe force-pushed the podman-pass-timeout-stop-to-systemd branch from acab826 to 7d22f04 Compare June 21, 2024 11:46
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jun 21, 2024 via email

@giuseppe
Copy link
Member Author

good to merge?

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 23, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 23, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit bf2de41 into containers:main Jun 23, 2024
90 checks passed
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2024
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants