Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: test c/common pasta-result branch #22043

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Mar 14, 2024

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 14, 2024

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None label Mar 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 14, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 14, 2024
Copy link

Cockpit tests failed for commit 18e5d5cdb6312341fa8e8aa608b82746d20ff587. @martinpitt, @jelly, @mvollmer please check.

@jiridanek
Copy link

jiridanek commented Mar 14, 2024

Dependencies resolved.
============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
 Package                           Architecture               Version                                                                               Repository                                                                         Size
============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Upgrading:
 podman                            x86_64                     102:5.0.0~dev-1.20240314140356800899.pr22043.29.18e5d5cdb.fc40                        copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:packit:containers-podman-22043                      15 M
 podman-remote                     x86_64                     102:5.0.0~dev-1.20240314140356800899.pr22043.29.18e5d5cdb.fc40                        copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:packit:containers-podman-22043                     9.7 M

Transaction Summary
============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Upgrade  2 Packages

Total download size: 24 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/2): podman-5.0.0~dev-1.20240314140356800899.pr22043.29.18e5d5cdb.fc40.x86_64.rpm                                                                                                                         9.4 MB/s |  15 MB     00:01    
(2/2): podman-remote-5.0.0~dev-1.20240314140356800899.pr22043.29.18e5d5cdb.fc40.x86_64.rpm                                                                                                                  5.5 MB/s | 9.7 MB     00:01    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now,

podman run --rm -it quay.io/fedora/fedora:38-x86_64 curl http://download-node-02.eng.bos.redhat.com

works with my split DNS! Thanks!

@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Mar 14, 2024

@jiridanek Thanks for checking!

@jiridanek
Copy link

Had a few unpleasant moments figuring out how to undo that install

$ sudo dnf history list | head
$ sudo dnf history rollback 525

has gotten me back to my original (broken) state

Copy link

Cockpit tests failed for commit f853af47024009bb83425c94e61d308de392f861. @martinpitt, @jelly, @mvollmer please check.

Copy link

Cockpit tests failed for commit 0236ff3. @martinpitt, @jelly, @mvollmer please check.

@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Mar 19, 2024

pushed my fixes into #22079 as this already contains the vendor changes and would not pass without it.

@Luap99 Luap99 closed this Mar 19, 2024
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Jun 18, 2024
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 18, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. No New Tests Allow PR to proceed without adding regression tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants