Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v4.9] Bump to c/common v0.57.4, buildkit v0.12.5, c/buidah v1.33.5 #21485

Merged

Conversation

TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

As the title says. The common bump fixes a timezone issue for OCP. Buildkit bump fixes a number of CVEs including but probably not limited to: CVE-2024-23651, CVE-2024-23652, and CVE-2024-23653

Replaces #21479

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

As the title says. The common bump fixes a timezone issue for OCP. Buildkit bump fixes a number of CVEs including but probably not limited to: CVE-2024-23651, CVE-2024-23652, and CVE-2024-23653

[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: TomSweeneyRedHat

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 2, 2024
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member Author

@ashley-cui and @mheon on the 4.9 branch with the PR. PTAL

@ashley-cui
Copy link
Member

Thanks @TomSweeneyRedHat !

LGTM

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member Author

The boltdb tests failed on this 4.9 repo. Safe to assume it's a known issue and/or should I rerun them? @edsantiago thoughts?

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Feb 2, 2024

Two entirely different test failures. Flakes, looks like. Lots of flakes.

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Feb 2, 2024

I'm just going to go ahead and
/lgtm
/hold

We can merge once CI passes, but it seems like just rerunning at this point

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 2, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 2, 2024
@ashley-cui
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 2, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit bab08f4 into containers:v4.9 Feb 2, 2024
89 of 90 checks passed
@TomSweeneyRedHat TomSweeneyRedHat deleted the dev/tsweeney/1.33.5-2 branch February 2, 2024 20:26
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label May 3, 2024
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 3, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants