Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make docs: sanity check for broken man pages #17576

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2023

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

A recent commit to an included option file resulted in
completely broken man pages, where the markdown processor
just choked and sent the "included file blah blah" markdown
straight through to the nroff source. Hilarity ensued.

The string "included file options/" should never appear
in nroff. This adds a last-minute check to make sure
a similar error never happens again.

(As suggested by @Luap99 we should also add validators for
markdown and/or nroff.)

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

None

A recent commit to an included option file resulted in
completely broken man pages, where the markdown processor
just choked and sent the "included file blah blah" markdown
straight through to the nroff source. Hilarity ensued.

The string "included file options/" should never appear
in nroff. This adds a last-minute check to make sure
a similar error never happens again.

(As suggested by @Luap99 we should also add validators for
markdown and/or nroff.)

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Feb 20, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

dial tcp: lookup cdn03.quay.io: no such host

suggests that #17505 does not resolve the cdn03 flake.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 20, 2023

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a4f7bdc into containers:main Feb 20, 2023
@edsantiago edsantiago deleted the manpage_check branch February 20, 2023 15:31
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 9, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants