Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kube-play: add support for HostIPC in pod.Spec #17186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2023

Conversation

danishprakash
Copy link
Contributor

@danishprakash danishprakash commented Jan 23, 2023

Adds support for hostIPC in Pod manifest for podman kube play as discussed in #17168

Signed-off-by: danishprakash [email protected]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

- play-kube: add support for hostIPC in pod.Spec

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM besides the comment nit.

Thanks for contributing!

pkg/specgen/podspecgen.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
* play_kube_test: add tests

Signed-off-by: danishprakash <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 26, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danishprakash, vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 26, 2023
@umohnani8
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jan 26, 2023
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jan 26, 2023

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 26, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 49b809a into containers:main Jan 26, 2023
vrothberg added a commit to vrothberg/libpod that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2023
containers/pull/17186 and containers/pull/17201 have been
merged at roughly the same time.  Both work fine in isolation but the
new kube test breaks in combination.

Fix the IPC kube test to make CI healthy.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 13, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants