Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix flake in kube system test #17108

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2023

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Increase the loop range from 5 to 20 to make sure we give the service enough time to transition to inactive. Other tests have the same range with 0.5 seconds sleeps, so I expect the new value to be sufficient and consistent.

Fixes: #17093
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

Increase the loop range from 5 to 20 to make sure we give the service
enough time to transition to inactive.  Other tests have the same range
with 0.5 seconds sleeps, so I expect the new value to be sufficient and
consistent.

Fixes: containers#17093
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 13, 2023
@vrothberg vrothberg marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2023 14:40
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Jan 13, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 13, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 13, 2023
Copy link
Member

@TomSweeneyRedHat TomSweeneyRedHat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
although I think I'd be more comfortable bumping to 10 first. @edsantiago WDYT?

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

I'm fine with the current bump to 20 (i.e., 10 seconds). Remember, that's only a worst-case. Given the rarity of this flake, I expect runs to take only one extra second. A fine price to pay to avoid the flake.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 13, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 13, 2023
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jan 14, 2023

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 14, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 64988ad into containers:main Jan 14, 2023
@vrothberg vrothberg deleted the fix-17093 branch January 14, 2023 06:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 15, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 15, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[email protected] template: expected inactive, got active
5 participants