Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

E2E Test: Play Kube set deadline to connection to avoid hangs #17083

Merged

Conversation

ygalblum
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Ygal Blum [email protected]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

No

None

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, not sure if this is actually the problem but it will make it more robust either way.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 11, 2023
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 11, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 11, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 11, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99, vrothberg, ygalblum

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jan 11, 2023

Lint errors

@ygalblum ygalblum force-pushed the kube-port-test-set-deadline branch from 9f4d0ac to 5b1bdf9 Compare January 11, 2023 16:56
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 11, 2023
@ygalblum
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Luap99 @vrothberg I've changed how I set the deadline so that it will refresh on each timeout error to make sure that one hang does not consume the time of the following retries. PTAL again

@ygalblum
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mheon Thanks. The errors triggered me to change the implementation

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jan 11, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 11, 2023
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Not my area of expertise, but am releasing because we have two LGTMs and I want this in stat.

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 11, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 8a0d25f into containers:main Jan 11, 2023
@ygalblum ygalblum deleted the kube-port-test-set-deadline branch January 12, 2023 08:16
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 15, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 15, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants