Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

podman-play system test: refactor #17072

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2023

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

The test file was a rat's nest of long complicated yaml strings
all differing only slightly. Clean it up, by adding a helper
function with optional parameters.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

None

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

Waiting for #17058; I will rebase once that merges. I just want to see if there are any gotchas I missed in my local testing.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 11, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 11, 2023
@edsantiago edsantiago changed the title DRAFT: podman-play system test: refactor podman-play system test: refactor Jan 11, 2023
@edsantiago edsantiago marked this pull request as draft January 11, 2023 15:42
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 11, 2023
The kube-play test file was a rat's nest of long complicated
yaml strings all differing only slightly. Clean it up, by
adding a helper function with optional parameters. The
helper is ugly, but the actual test code (the important
stuff) is cleaner.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@edsantiago edsantiago marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2023 19:29
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 12, 2023
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

@vrothberg PTAL (low priority)

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

@giuseppe @flouthoc can we merge it? I need to touch the test file and want to avoid merge conflicts.

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Jan 13, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 13, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e473c93 into containers:main Jan 13, 2023
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Thanks, Paul!

@edsantiago edsantiago deleted the refactor_700 branch January 13, 2023 14:20
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 15, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 15, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants