Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
install: Add
ensure-completion
verb, wire up ostree-deploy → bootc
When bootc was created, it started to become a superset of ostree; in particular things like `/usr/lib/bootc/kargs.d` and logically bound images. However...Anaconda today is still invoking `ostree container image deploy`. Main fix -------- When bootc takes over the `/usr/libexec/ostree/ext/ostree-container` entrypoint, make the existing `ostree container image deploy` CLI actually just call back into bootc to fix things up. No additional work required other than getting an updated bootc in the Anaconda ISO. Old Anaconda ISOs ----------------- But, a further problem here is that Anaconda is only updated once per OS major+minor - e.g. there won't be an update to it for the lifetime of RHEL 9.5 or Fedora 41. We want the ability to ship new features and bugfixes in those OSes (especially RHEL9.5). So given that we have a newer bootc in the target container, we can do this: ``` %post --erroronfail bootc install ensure-completion %end ``` And will fix things up. Of course there's fun $details here...the way Anaconda implements `%post` is via a hand-augmented `chroot` i.e. a degenerate container, and we need to escape that and fix some things up (such as a missing cgroupfs mount). Summmary -------- - With a newer bootc in the ISO, everything just works - For older ISOs, one can add the `%post` above as a workaround. Implementation details: Cross-linking bootc and ostree-rs-ext ------------------------------------------------------------- This whole thing is very confusing because now, the linkage between bootc and ostree-rs-ext is bidirectional. In the case of `bootc install to-filesystem`, we end up calling into ostree-rs-ext, and we *must not* recurse back into bootc, because at least for kernel arguments we might end up applying them *twice*. We do this by passing a CLI argument. The second problem is the crate-level dependency; right now they're independent crates so we can't have ostree-rs-ext actually call into bootc directly, as convenient as that would be. So we end up forking ourselves as a subprocess. But that's not too bad because we need to carry a subprocess-based entrypoint *anyways* for the Anaconda `%post` case. Implementation details: /etc/resolv.conf ---------------------------------------- There's some surprising stuff going on in how Anaconda handles `/etc/resolv.conf` in the target root that I got burned by. In Fedora it's trying to query if systemd-resolved is enabled in the target or something? I ended up writing some code to just try to paper over this to ensure we have networking in the `%post` where we need it to fetch LBIs. Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information