feat: output all packages resulting from split in version 1.31.0

[iisakkirotko]

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

In solara version 1.31.0, the package was split into different parts:

• The pytest plugin became pytest-ipywidgets
• Solara itself was split into solara-ui and solara-server

These packages are all in the widgetti/solara repository, so it makes sense to output them all from here. This should output all packages, and ensure correct interdependency.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe:

• Failed to even lint the recipe, probably because of a conda-smithy bug 😢. This likely indicates a problem in your meta.yaml, though. To get a traceback to help figure out what's going on, install conda-smithy and run conda smithy recipe-lint . from the recipe directory.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[maartenbreddels]

@dhirschfeld we spend quite some time understanding why this recipe fails with:

export PREFIX=/home/conda/feedstock_root/build_artifacts/solara_1713540897963/_test_env_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold
export SRC_DIR=/home/conda/feedstock_root/build_artifacts/solara_1713540897963/test_tmp
import: 'solara_assets'
import: 'solara_assets'
+ pip check
solara-assets 1.31.0 requires solara, which is not installed.
WARNING: Tests failed for solara-assets-1.31.0-pyhca7485f_0.conda - moving package to /home/conda/feedstock_root/build_artifacts/broken
TESTS FAILED: solara-assets-1.31.0-pyhca7485f_0.conda

Can you check this out, if you maybe understand what is going on?

cheers,

Maarten

[dhirschfeld]

I'm happy to take a look, though I doubt I have any greater insight on the issue. I probably can't get to it until the weekend though.

[maartenbreddels]

We are lost right now, so a fresh look might help, 🙏

[dhirschfeld]

It seems that it's just pip check which is failing. It's complaining that solara isn't installed when it quite clearly is:

+ pip check
solara-assets 1.31.0 requires solara, which is not installed.

...but the solara conda pacakage is installed:

    sniffio:                   1.3.1-pyhd8ed1ab_0         conda-forge
    solara:                    1.31.0-pyhd8ed1ab_0        local      
    solara-assets:             1.31.0-pyhca7485f_0        local      
    solara-server:             1.31.0-pyhca7485f_0        local      
    solara-ui:                 1.31.0-pyhd8ed1ab_0        local      
    stack_data:                0.6.2-pyhd8ed1ab_0         conda-forge

IMO pip check can be a nice safety net when it works, but IME it reasonably often fails to understand conda packaging.

My view is that it's a tool designed for a different ecosystem and if it works, great - it provides a sense check on your deps, but if it fails for obviously spurious reasons then I just comment it out.

My recommendation here is to just comment out pip check for solara_assets.

[dhirschfeld]

xref: pypa/pip#11159 (comment)

[maartenbreddels]

I think given that solara-assets is pretty simple, we could skip it indeed. Thanks for this!

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I was trying to look for recipes to lint for you, but it appears we have a merge conflict.
Please try to merge or rebase with the base branch to resolve this conflict.

Please ping the 'conda-forge/core' team (using the @ notation in a comment) if you believe this is a bug.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.