Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Arch Migrator #262

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

regro-cf-autotick-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This feedstock is being rebuilt as part of the aarch64/ppc64le migration.

Feel free to merge the PR if CI is all green, but please don't close it
without reaching out the the ARM migrators first at @conda-forge/arm-arch.

If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/6806434710, please use this URL for debugging.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@ngam ngam mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2023
@mfansler
Copy link
Member

mfansler commented Nov 9, 2023

This seems pertinent, RE: Travis CI jobs aren't being generated here (they should be): Gitter Thread

In case the link is a hassle, here's the content:

FYI if your feedstock uses Travis CI and you are not seeing Travis CI builds, please make sure the commit author (yourself or another contributor) does a relogin to Travis CI and then restart CI. This should remedy the issue

Please reach out in the thread if you have questions or issues. Thank you! 🙏

@ngam
Copy link
Contributor

ngam commented Nov 9, 2023

I will look into it later today. I think there may be issues beyond just compiling natively, but we shall see...

@ngam
Copy link
Contributor

ngam commented Nov 10, 2023

_maybe_raise_for_conda_build
        raise exc
    conda_libmamba_solver.conda_build_exceptions.ExplainedDependencyNeedsBuildingError: Unsatisfiable dependencies for platform linux-aarch64: {MatchSpec("openblas-ilp64")}
    Encountered problems while solving:
      - nothing provides requested openblas-ilp64
    
    Could not solve for environment specs

@ngam
Copy link
Contributor

ngam commented Nov 10, 2023

Seems like we have two distinct issues now:

  1. Tests failing and testing taking more resources --- we could likely fix this by adjusting our tests on all platforms
  2. Missing openblas-ilp64 on aarch64 --- I believe we discussed this before and I don't remember what happened

I can probably push this forward, but my general use of Julia is close to zero these days and I am likely out of the loop on what's happened in julialand.

Hi @mfansler, what exactly is your need (aarch or ppc)? Are you interested in helping to get these issues resolved?

@mfansler
Copy link
Member

@schlichtanders would be the one to ask - he has the interest in Arch builds. I was mostly just querying about the status of the PR to communicate this to others.

@schlichtanders
Copy link

schlichtanders commented Nov 13, 2023

I am running stuff on Arm64 with CondaPkg and wanted to use r-juliacall. That depends on julia and because of this it is not installable on Arm64 out of the box. I now created a workaround for myself - a custom build of r-juliacall. But in general, it would be great if julia-dependent conda packages would just install everywhere out of the box.

@mkitti
Copy link
Contributor

mkitti commented Nov 13, 2023

We have a few choices here:

  1. Work on Julia dependencies in the conda-forge ecosystem to better accomodate Julia's needs
  2. Compromise conda-forge principles and download binaries built elsewhere (e.g. juliaup)
  3. Create a distinct julia conda channel that just download binaries built elsewhere
  4. Don't use conda to obtain julia

@schlichtanders
Copy link

For me all options are fine (my motivation is very practical - being able to install the conda package r-juliacall out of the box.)

@ngam ngam marked this pull request as draft February 3, 2024 02:47
@corneliusroemer corneliusroemer mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants