Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mark grpc-cpp builds with no abseil run-export as broken #482

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2022

Conversation

h-vetinari
Copy link
Member

As part of the fall-out from conda-forge/grpc-cpp-feedstock#213 & friends (basically, private linkage for static builds turns public...) there are still some problematic windows builds that don't have a run-export on abseil, and can therefore be co-installed with older abseil versions, but then fail because the static grpc-build still needs libabseil-static with the same ABI to be present as at build-time.

I verified the affected build numbers in the blame per branch, happy to provide more details if requested.

Queries used

mamba repoquery search grpc-cpp=1.46.4=*_4 -p win-64 --json | grep url | awk -F'conda-forge/' '{print $2}'  | awk -F'",' '{print $1}
mamba repoquery search grpc-cpp=1.46.4=*_5 -p win-64 --json | grep url | awk -F'conda-forge/' '{print $2}'  | awk -F'",' '{print $1}
mamba repoquery search grpc-cpp=1.47.1=*_4 -p win-64 --json | grep url | awk -F'conda-forge/' '{print $2}'  | awk -F'",' '{print $1}
mamba repoquery search grpc-cpp=1.47.1=*_5 -p win-64 --json | grep url | awk -F'conda-forge/' '{print $2}'  | awk -F'",' '{print $1}
mamba repoquery search grpc-cpp=1.48.0=*_4 -p win-64 --json | grep url | awk -F'conda-forge/' '{print $2}'  | awk -F'",' '{print $1}
mamba repoquery search grpc-cpp=1.48.0=*_5 -p win-64 --json | grep url | awk -F'conda-forge/' '{print $2}'  | awk -F'",' '{print $1}
mamba repoquery search grpc-cpp=1.48.1=*_0 -p win-64 --json | grep url | awk -F'conda-forge/' '{print $2}'  | awk -F'",' '{print $1}

@h-vetinari h-vetinari requested a review from a team as a code owner September 8, 2022 10:25
@h-vetinari
Copy link
Member Author

PTAL @hmaarrfk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants