Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recommend Stack upgrade when appropriate (fixes #1681) #4729

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 22, 2019

Conversation

snoyberg
Copy link
Contributor

Note: Documentation fixes for https://docs.haskellstack.org/en/stable/ should target the "stable" branch, not master.

Please include the following checklist in your PR:

  • Any changes that could be relevant to users have been recorded in the ChangeLog.md
  • The documentation has been updated, if necessary.

Please also shortly describe how you tested your change. Bonus points for added tests!

@snoyberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I forgot one detail on this, please don't review/merge until I update this... there's a FIXME if anyone's curious.

@snoyberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, second commit addresses the FIXME, this is ready for review.

@snoyberg snoyberg force-pushed the 1681-check-recent-version branch 2 times, most recently from 787c5e6 to 56c2cea Compare April 15, 2019 07:58
@snoyberg snoyberg requested a review from borsboom April 15, 2019 19:54
Copy link
Contributor

@borsboom borsboom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like this is using the latest version on Hackage to check for a new Stack version. I don't believe this takes into account that we sometimes do patchlevel Hackage-only releases to add compatibility with newer versions of dependencies. These patchlevel Hackage releases don't have any changes in functionality and so never get a full release. I think we should ignore those when it comes to prompting the user to upgrade, especially since stack upgrade won't be able to do a binary upgrade to them. I think, instead, you could compare the 3-component minor version of the current binary (which you can get with Stack.Types.Version.stackMinorVersion) to the minor version on hackage (which you can get by passing the hackage version through Stack.Types.Version.minorVersion). The Docker code does something similar when it needs to download a Docker-compatible stack executable. The release process has a policy that patchlevels are only ever used for Hackage-only releases, so this should be a safe assumption to make.

src/Stack/Runners.hs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
snoyberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2019
@snoyberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Apologies for merging master into this branch during a review, but due to how the caching system on CI is working, the tests will fail with a migration error unless I include the schema change on master. The relevant change to address your comments is 191301a. Thanks for the review 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@borsboom borsboom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be possible to simplify tracking of the time of last check.

src/Stack/Storage.hs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@snoyberg snoyberg force-pushed the 1681-check-recent-version branch from ce3d9f9 to b85d072 Compare April 17, 2019 06:08
src/Stack/Storage.hs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
This leverages a single table and upsert, so that we update records in
place, and can reuse this table for additional tracking of
last-performed actions in the future.
@snoyberg snoyberg merged commit d2b3930 into master Apr 22, 2019
@snoyberg snoyberg deleted the 1681-check-recent-version branch April 22, 2019 14:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants