-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 841
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support .tar archives #3647 #3655
Merged
+28
−14
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the current code will end up reading the file 3 times. Though perhaps it wouldn't be as bad as that, since the decoding should fail quickly.
Might be worth pulling
withBinaryFile
+hGetContents
out to the top level. Could increase memory residency, but that seems fine.I'd actually lean towards using something like
L.readFile
, but I guess the exception handling isn't so great there w.r.t. closing the handle. This is a side note, but I'm a bit surprised the code wouldn't use a weak pointer and also close the handle of the lbs is GCed.Note that
L.readFile
is used above in the unzip code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd much rather have multiple file reads than potentially unbounded memory usage, though in this case unbounded is basically impossible: parsing should fail immediately. I'll update this to do one read. Note that on master, I've already changed this to use a new helper
withLazyFile
instead of explicitwithBinaryFile
andhGetContents
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool, makes sense!
Why merge this into stable instead of master?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking that it's a small enough change to include in a patch. Since we're actively planning on such a patch, I'm trying to include as many minor, backwards compatible changes as I can. You think it's better to put this one on master?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems fine to me to have it in the patch version to, just curious