Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"sharable" false positive? #2690

Closed
polluks2 opened this issue Dec 30, 2022 · 9 comments
Closed

"sharable" false positive? #2690

polluks2 opened this issue Dec 30, 2022 · 9 comments
Labels
dictionary Changes to the dictionary

Comments

@polluks2
Copy link

See https://grammarist.com/spelling/sharable-shareable/

@DimitriPapadopoulos DimitriPapadopoulos added the dictionary Changes to the dictionary label Dec 30, 2022
@DimitriPapadopoulos
Copy link
Collaborator

DimitriPapadopoulos commented Dec 30, 2022

Indeed, both variants can be found in:

A single dictionary has shareable only:

Some dictionaries lack both:

Google:

I really don't know. Perhaps move to rare?

@skangas
Copy link
Collaborator

skangas commented Dec 30, 2022

Google:

* `shareable` [276,000,000 hits](https://www.google.com/search?q=shareable)

* `sharable` [12,500,000 hits](https://www.google.com/search?q=sharable)

I really don't know. Perhaps move to rare?

I think it's definitely not an error as such, so moving it to rare or deleting it outright sounds good to me. Perhaps there should even be a new dictionary which includes only the "generally preferred" spellings of words?

@DimitriPapadopoulos
Copy link
Collaborator

DimitriPapadopoulos commented Jan 2, 2023

I guess the same might be told of other -able->-eable fixes.

Partial explanations here:

BTW, there are also incorrect fixes the other way round (see #2693 and #2694):

resizeable->resizable
unuseable->unusable
useable->usable

@DimitriPapadopoulos
Copy link
Collaborator

Is anyone willing to push a merge request?

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Contributor

matkoniecz commented Jan 19, 2023

Is anyone willing to push a merge request?

I am still waiting for my merge requests from 2021 to be processed :)

And in general bottleneck for external contributors for this project clearly is not at making pull requests - it is at processing them.

@DimitriPapadopoulos
Copy link
Collaborator

@matkoniecz How is this related to this issue?

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Contributor

@DimitriPapadopoulos Not strongly related to this specific issue, but is related to request to make a pull request for that issue.

@DimitriPapadopoulos
Copy link
Collaborator

DimitriPapadopoulos commented Jan 19, 2023

I was under the impression that there is no consensus here, and probably no rules that define how to define and reach consensus. The way out is perhaps to define such rules, not tackle individual cases. Adding comments in unrelated issues will drain time resources that cannot be dedicated to defining such rules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dictionary Changes to the dictionary
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants