Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix handling of the @lineSeparator option changes in CodeMirror component #1890

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2024

Conversation

VasylMarchuk
Copy link
Collaborator

@VasylMarchuk VasylMarchuk commented Jun 22, 2024

Related to #1231

Brief

Reload @document in CodeMirror component when @lineSeparator argument changes

Details

When toggling @lineSeparator option between \n, \r\n, \r, and undefined, the document was not reloaded or re-rendered, therefore toggling of the @document argument on and off was required to re-apply the setting to the rendered document. This fixes it.

Demo

2024-06-22.15.27.50.mov

Checklist

  • I've thoroughly self-reviewed my changes
  • I've added tests for my changes, unless they affect admin-only areas (or are otherwise not worth testing)
  • I've verified any visual changes using Percy (add a commit with [percy] in the message to trigger)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced the CodeMirrorComponent to handle specific options that require the document to be reloaded, improving the overall functionality and user experience.

@VasylMarchuk VasylMarchuk added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 22, 2024
@VasylMarchuk VasylMarchuk self-assigned this Jun 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the CodeMirrorComponent significantly enhance its flexibility by introducing a new conditional block designed for handling specific options. This ensures that the document is re-loaded efficiently after applying these options, potentially improving user experience by maintaining the editor's state in a more dynamic and responsive manner.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/components/code-mirror.ts Added a new conditional block in CodeMirrorComponent class for handling options that need document reloading.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CodeMirrorComponent
    participant DocumentLoader

    User ->> CodeMirrorComponent: Set Specific Option
    CodeMirrorComponent ->> CodeMirrorComponent: Check if Requires Reload
    alt Requires Reload
        CodeMirrorComponent ->> DocumentLoader: Reload Document
        DocumentLoader -->> CodeMirrorComponent: Document Reloaded
    end
    CodeMirrorComponent -->> User: Option Applied
Loading

Poem

In the CodeMirror's gleam, options dance anew,
A rabbit's touch, reloading is true,
Swift as the breeze, changes take flight,
The document refreshed, shining bright,
Code flows like magic, a wondrous view.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 22, 2024

Test Results

  1 files  ±0    1 suites  ±0   9m 45s ⏱️ - 2m 7s
539 tests ±0  504 ✅ +4  35 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
554 runs  ±0  519 ✅ +8  35 💤 ±0  0 ❌  - 4 

Results for commit 3e35061. ± Comparison against base commit cc2bd37.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cc2bd37 and 0c902e3.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/components/code-mirror.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/components/code-mirror.ts (1)

354-364: Ensure proper handling of lineSeparator changes.

The added conditional block checks if the lineSeparator option has changed and reloads the document accordingly. This is a crucial fix for the issue described in the PR. It's important to ensure that this logic only triggers when the lineSeparator option changes and not inadvertently due to other updates.

  • Performance Consideration: Reloading the entire document for every minor change could be inefficient, especially for large documents. Consider optimizing this by checking if the lineSeparator has actually changed before reloading.
  • Testing: Ensure that unit tests cover scenarios where the lineSeparator changes as well as cases where it remains the same to avoid unnecessary reloads.
Verification successful

Ensure proper handling of lineSeparator changes.

The integration test file tests/integration/components/code-mirror-test.js includes tests for the lineSeparator option. This confirms that the feature is covered by tests, ensuring that changes to the lineSeparator are correctly handled.

  • Performance Consideration: Ensure that the tests include scenarios where the lineSeparator changes as well as cases where it remains the same to avoid unnecessary reloads.

  • Testing: Given that tests for lineSeparator are present, verify that they cover the required scenarios and edge cases.

  • Code Location:

    • tests/integration/components/code-mirror-test.js
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `lineSeparator` change triggers the document reload correctly and only when the `lineSeparator` actually changes.

# Test: Search for unit tests covering the `lineSeparator` changes.
fd 'test' --type f --exec rg --type python 'lineSeparator'

Length of output: 5171



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify the correct file type for the tests.

# List test files to determine the correct file type.
fd 'test' --type f

Length of output: 8265



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `lineSeparator` change triggers the document reload correctly and only when the `lineSeparator` actually changes.

# Test: Search for unit tests covering the `lineSeparator` changes in JavaScript and TypeScript files.
rg 'lineSeparator' --glob '**/*.js' --glob '**/*.ts' tests/

Length of output: 462

@VasylMarchuk VasylMarchuk force-pushed the code-mirror/fix-line-separator-option branch from 0c902e3 to 3e35061 Compare June 22, 2024 13:21
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c902e3 and 3e35061.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/components/code-mirror.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/components/code-mirror.ts

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 22, 2024

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 1.92kB ⬆️

Bundle name Size Change
client-array-push 26.05MB 1.92kB ⬆️

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants