Post-Judging QA

[thebrittfactor]

1. Please post feedback about specific findings on the relevant issue in this repo.
2. Post a comment in this discussion linking to all findings you've commented on, along with any general feedback for the judge.

The judge for this contest is @3docSec.

Both the Validation repo and the Findings repo will be open to wardens with the SR role, for the purposes of post-judging QA.

• All post-judging QA requests must be posted in this Github Discussion in the findings repo.
• QA and Gas reports closed by Validators (i.e. not added to the findings repo) are NOT eligible.

Reminders

• Please keep your comments as fact-based as possible.
• C4 judges have final authority in determining validity and severity.
• Please link to specific issues and don't try to start discussions here.
• Please familiarize yourselves with our Good Citizen Policy.

Thank you!

[3docSec]

Hi all, I will be answering questions after the PJQA period is over.

To anticipate questions that will surely be asked on the subject, I too have contributed with some findings; these have the “ineligible for award” label, and will not be counted for payouts for fairness to other participants

[zhaojio]

Hi @3docSec, thanks judging and contribution,
I left a comment on #19

[ololade97]

Hi @3docSec,

I left a comment on issue #31.

[ololade97]

Hi @3docSec,

I left a comment on #11.

[ololade97]

Hi @3docSec,

I left a comment on #12

[3docSec]

PJQA is over, I will shortly reply and mark 👍 each of the comments as I process them