Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chainlink oracle uses deprecated function #822

Closed
c4-submissions opened this issue Nov 15, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Chainlink oracle uses deprecated function #822

c4-submissions opened this issue Nov 15, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-34 insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards

Comments

@c4-submissions
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-kelp/blob/f751d7594051c0766c7ecd1e68daeb0661e43ee3/src/oracles/ChainlinkPriceOracle.sol#L38

Vulnerability details

Summary

Prices from Chainlink are fetched using a deprecated function.

Impact

The ChainlinkPriceOracle contract is used to interface with Chainlink price feeds to obtain the prices for the different LST assets used in the protocol.

The implementation is using the function latestAnswer() which is deprecated and should not be used anymore.

latestAnswer
⚠️ THIS FUNCTION IS DEPRECATED. DO NOT USE THIS FUNCTION.

Proof of Concept

The implementation of getAssetPrice() is using the deprecated function:

https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-kelp/blob/f751d7594051c0766c7ecd1e68daeb0661e43ee3/src/oracles/ChainlinkPriceOracle.sol#L37-L39

37:     function getAssetPrice(address asset) external view onlySupportedAsset(asset) returns (uint256) {
38:         return AggregatorInterface(assetPriceFeed[asset]).latestAnswer();
39:     }

Recommendation

Switch to latestRoundData().

Assessed type

Oracle

@c4-submissions c4-submissions added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working labels Nov 15, 2023
c4-submissions added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2023
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as insufficient quality report

@c4-pre-sort c4-pre-sort added the insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality label Nov 16, 2023
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as duplicate of #34

@c4-judge c4-judge added the unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards label Dec 1, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Dec 1, 2023

fatherGoose1 marked the issue as unsatisfactory:
Invalid

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-34 insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants